Friday, December 14, 2007
New York Times
Monday, December 10, 2007
The Waiting Room
The message from Lisa Loomer’s The Waiting Room was not about the most perfect women, but most stereotypical to their time period. If this was her intent she did a wonderful job.
In the beginning of the play the characters seem more stereotypical, but then as their sicknesses progress so does their attitude to more of an accepting mood. An example for
As for her choice of using the medical industry, this I don’t understand, I don’t understand what she was trying to prove, or just thought it’d be funny. Using this does make
With the comedic tone to this play Loomer uses, it seems as if she is almost making fun of modern day society. This I admire. Wanda would be the closest example to modern day society, I say closest, because since she’s using stereotypes it’s not “real.”
The final product of her play was very blunt, the message was clear, and easy to comprehend. You didn't have to look too far or too deep to get this full extent of the play, which isn't a bad thing.
Thursday, December 6, 2007
All those Fairy Tales that Drugged Us
They basically are though. Now I can perfectly understand where they are coming from and that entire article makes sense, even the historical facts used to support. Although I believe they should continue reading them these stories, I mean what else are we going to read to our youth? We can't read them chapter books because of lack of interest they'll have and what makes that more appropriate? I'd rather have women who think they need to be pretty who like reading rather than the complete opposite. Also the Grimm Fairy Tales were made in the 1800's to teach boys and girls their society roles, which makes perfect sense. We just held onto these classic stories for far to long, this isn't our fault, and it's no big deal. It's been far to engraved in our lives. In the article it insists on a parent aid to be there as if it were rated PG-13. It's a story. Sure it may make your little girl want to be pretty, and you're son either gay or masculine, like prince charming. The above quote when the two people on the study state that, then what's the point, what are we going to do to fix this? It doesn't make any sense. Also the reason why it's no big deal is because we don't get our entire influence of what are role in life from fairy tales anymore anyways. Fairy tales like everything else in our lives influence us, give me one influence and I can name 38472394 things wrong with it. The idea that they think famalies are actually reading, rather than watching the disney movies is a complete epidemic in itself.
Tuesday, December 4, 2007
False Advertising
In the Eye of the Beholder? an article of different cultural beauty and "westernised" beauty.
Both very different other than the fact they're both about a general idea of beauty to some extent. Acknowledging both discussions possibly my favorite thing said was said by Manny he brought to the surface that how strange it is that 74% of Americans are obese but then we're the ones being blamed for all the way too thin models. I had noticed that as well and wish we would have talked about that more, but I guess America is just really unhealthy.
From discussions you can't really learn facts because a discussion is usually held on facts the people already know, you sort of just realize things and start to open your personal perspective. One of the funniest things I heard was from Mike in the first discussion about "In the Eye of the Beholder?" He said something about how America has probably the most equality through out the sexes but at the same time we have the highest divorce rates, which I thought was hilarious and true. America is a little kid who doens't know how to deal with anything. I wish we would have came up with answers as of why westernised media has one of the biggest effects as well as what they're doing to persuade people so well. I was almost offended by the quote "The advent of coloured contact lenses has also enabled the darker skinned to westernise their eyes." Serisously what the F$^* does that mean? IT'S YOUR FAULT YOU BUY INTO IT. I'm tired of people thinking its the advertisment companies fault for your low self esteem. I don't even blame them for selling bleaching skin creams illegaly to people they buy it, they make a profit. They shouldn't sell it illegaly but that's authoritys stance not ours. Blaming the media is like blaming a fast-food resturaunt for making you fat, it doens't make any sense. People to be more strong minded as well as open minded. Its not "The more exposed we are to western media, the more we buy into it" it's the complete opposite taking away the big deal of it, over exposing it, takes away the glamor. Sure if you're weak minded Lerato Moloi is right.
Friday, November 30, 2007
Malian Women
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Dove campaign video
Within that 1 minute and 20 seconds I now realized what kind of kids we're breeding and the big fuss about self image. Now I personally don't really care that the media is doing this, okay whatever you buy into you're weak, I really don't care. Weak not meaning you realize one flaw in yourself, but weak meaning you let the media define your flaws. A reason I do care is because this is becoming more than just self imagine issuse but more like "if you look like this, you get this kind of life." So a lifestyle everythig engraved in our lives is obviously the most important and the media knows that.
2. What do you think about the central message of the commercial? Be specific and give examples to support your ideas.
With the example of a grade school girl it sort of portrays women as the target and all these images of "beauty" as the influence. Then at the end when it says "Talk to your daughter" it then shows that a mother-daughter relationship is good because you can be your daughter's influence.
Socrates cafe
Wednesday, November 28, 2007
Women...
Athenian women did less because society thought they were capable of less. Spartan women did more because society thought they were capable of more. Both places thought they were doing nothing wrong. I find it hard to explain the differences and which is better or worse because there are so many perspectives to approach this at. Spartan women were raised more equally to men but less like women where as athenian women were raised like women. Which is worse relys on perspective. I don't think either place did better or worse with their women no matter what the under lying cause was that they were meant for health children. I feel in Athen they realized how emotional women were they got more out of their marriage than athenian women but were far more limited.
2. If the Greeks are considered so advanced, so culturally elite, why do you believe gender equality (equality between men and women) was not established?
Not that they were considered so advanced they were, and I guess sad to say the fact that they didn't have equality between men and women didn't really effect the Greeks negatively, but we don't know if it would have effected them in a positive manner either. Also to their knowledge they thought they were using women to their full potential. Women as wifes were apparently only good for healthy procreation, not even for entertaining their husbands. People didn't really have spare time for "fun" so women didn't really work, in sparta they could participate in sports and make babies. Not for love, and not for companionship.
3. Based on your understanding of women in Ancient Greek society, how do you think women were depicted by artists at this time?
I have seen a few sculptures of women from Greece but if it wasn't for that I wouldn't even think they exist other than what they thought godesses look like. Possibly a frail and tired frame of a women who is pregnant, since they didn't eat much. As for Sparta same thing just a more muscular frame.
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
November 27
By asking this it sounds like youth is better than middle-aged, old, etc which I think neither is better than the other. Although some people are just better than other people in different ways. Honestly, youth we don't know how to act or deal with anything more than half the time, and we are highly dependent. (I can say this, I'm 14.) I sort of don't see what is so beautiful about us.
Since I have to answer the question as goes the following:
Our thought process and what comes out, I wouldn't say beautiful because it is often times annoying but it sure as damn is interesting. When you ask a question to someone and the younger they are in their state of mind, the more blunt and less influenced it will be. I find the less influenced it will be part to be the most beautiful. It's hard to find someone who isn't saying something biast, influenced, or limited by circumstance. Our answers aren't influenced because we're innocent but because we haven't really learned to care. We can say something as simple as "love is a husband and wife who like eachother very much" or something as ridiculous as "love is lust." You'll never know what we are capable of, or which kind of us you have. Ignorance is bliss, but it isn't beautiful.
PERFECTION DOES NOT EXIST, we can't even say we're close. This is so because there is not one person that is perfect, there are no standards what so ever, only what we and society puts on us which we don't even need to abide by. Have you noticed how the "pretty people" are always so confident it's not because they were born to be pretty, it's because they believed they were and made themselves fit into whatever they think is beautiful.
Monday, November 26, 2007
Beauty
This is an image of the musician: Conor Oberst he is beautiful in many different ways, which my idea of beauty must contain, diversity. His physical appeal is pleasing in the sense of: broad jaw line, dark, fairly short hair, an overly harsh stare and hazel eyes. (Which you cannot tell in the photo.) He has this over all style that he was dressed nice to go somewhere but something went wrong along the way, so he has a lack of effort while still looking good. I know his music which some of you may not, that adds to him, his music is phenomenal and beautiful all in its own. Also another thing the actual photography, nice lighting, amazing scenery, and again beautiful. This is him around the age 20, he is now 27, looks moderatly different, but still beautiful. What I am trying to get at is that beauty is a lot more than just the way something/someone looks.The next image I have chosen is too big to view on here because there is writing on it, so click on the link then click on the imagine again and it should be big enough to read the writing.
This picture is the work of Alex Pardee an artist like Conor Oberst I know both there backgrounds. When Alex was 13 years old he was submitted to a mental institue, and that is where he started his drawing. The collage on the left of this photo some are drawn by him, some are just chosen by prefrance. The writing is long, but worth the read the flow of the poetry is where all the beauty lies for me, as well as how he writes, how randoms, but still focused on one question. This is the ultimate form of beauty, I think of beauty as art in any form it doesn't matter but just artistic and not generic, I am bored by today's beauty. I am tired of all of it and this probably one of the most biazzare pieces I have ever see.
Click Here For Image
